Bin Laden and Hitler the Similarities Between Them

Running Head: BIN LADEN AND HITLER: SIMILARITIES Bin Laden and Hitler: The Similarities Between Them \ Mychelle Morgan University of Phoenix COMM / 215 October 12, 2005 Osama bin Laden and Adolf Hitler: The Lesser of Two Evils Fear, hate and disregard. Are these feelings prominent when you think of Adolf Hitler or Osama bin Landen? These names bring equivalent emotions to the same nation of people Ââ€" Americans. Although these two historical figures posses different ideologies, the complicity and the similarities between them, including their desire for control, can and did result in massive devastation. Hitler worshipped Germany, as bin Laden worships Allah. They are evil, evil in that they wanted to destroy a race of people who†¦show more content†¦They were unquestioning, uneducated men ready to serve Hitler and Germany at any cost. The threat of being hauled off to a concentration camp forced petrified Germans into following Hitler and never opposing his regime. On August 2, 1934, Hitler was named Fà ¼hrer, or supreme leader, of the German people. It was unveiled to world that Hitler had achieved total power in Germany. Years went by as Hitler and the Nazis bullied their way into making the German people praise and obey them. But on September 3, 1939, the biggest bloodshed and obliteration would begin. It is known as World War II. Five years, eight months and six days was the duration of this deadly spree. More than 40 million people were killed, all for the fanaticism and madness of one man, Adolf Hitler. History of Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden was born in Saudi Arabia to a wealthy Yemeni family. Mohammed Bin Laden, Osamas father, was a wealthy construction entrepreneur who died in a helicopter crash when bin Laden was only 10 years old. Bin Laden, one of about 50 children, was then sent to live with his alienated mother, Hamida (Johnson, 2005). Hamida was a beautiful Syrian woman who was very independent. This independence gave her the nickname slave, given by the other wives. Therefore, the young bin Laden received the nickname son of a slave. Due to this fact, Osamas brothers often rejected him. Bin Laden was taught by tutors and spent a lot of hisShow MoreRelated Terrorism Essay3592 Words   |  15 Pagesworst terrorist groups the world had every seen is al-Qaeda. This group is one of the new generation terrorist groups; it all began in early 1995 when Osama bin Laden came back to Afghanistan from Sudan. Every educated person in this world knows al-Qaeda or Bin laden the found er of this group. The worst thing about this group is quot;Bin Laden is the leader of a movement that doesnt necessarily need a leader to function and be effective,quot; said Juliette N. Kayyem, a terrorism expert at the HarvardRead MoreWar on Terror1421 Words   |  6 Pagesevaluated as reliable for Soviet society. The Soviets used terror to break the traditional societal structure that evolved during the Czars ‘reign†. Under the time Soviets ruled the country, the gap between the poor and the rich became larger. The rich became richer and they hide the poor to work for them. Later on, that created the food shortage in the urban of the society because the rich only produced what they needed for life instead of what society needed. The duty of the Soviet Union is to maintainRead MoreLeadership : The Power Of Influence1512 Words   |  7 Pagesclosely understood when associated with particular nouns. Hitler, Josef Mengele, and Osama bin Laden are just a few that can be easily identified and carry the weight of what influential leaders are capable of. Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr., are also among the most influential people to have lived. One can plainly juxtapose the differences between these two classes of leaders, which often shadows the similarities shared: the power of influence. Leaders and Teachers AreRead MoreTaking a Look at Conspiracy Theories1319 Words   |  5 Pagesthough, as the Jews once again faced hatred because of a lie. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a text that details a secret meeting between Jewish elders in a cemetery to discuss a conspiracy to take over the entire world, and despite them being a obvious forgery (Hughes, 2012). Despite being a known forgery, the Protocol document was used by the Nazis and Hitler to aid in increasing the anti-semetic sentiment in Germany and Europe. Even Henry Ford was an anti-semite; â€Å"his obsession with cleanlinessRead MoreLeadership2050 Words   |  9 Pagesemphasise this. TL was also criticised for not being able to standalone as a single theory as the understanding of other theories was essential in order for its concepts to be grasped by the potential leader. Babou (2008) â€Å"Understanding the difference between transactional and transformational leadership is vital in getting the whole concept of transf ormational leadership theory† (pg1). Due to different viewpoints and counter arguments against TL, Bass and Avolio developed The Full Range Leadership ModelRead MoreGp Essay Mainpoints24643 Words   |  99 Pagesonto the Internet, info digitized (google books) †¢ Much knowledge residing in books today that have not found their way onto the Internet (exclusive information) †¢ But†¦ Gutenberg Project transcribes old literary texts from all eras, posting them online for free †¢ Websites such as Questia and JSTOR store full academic journals, books, newspaper, magazines †¦ (portable too!) †¢ Also limits imposed by costs of publication, book cannot contain everything. Editors sometimes forced to truncateRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesPerception? 166 Factors That Influence Perception 167 165 Person Perception: Making Judgments About Others 168 Attribution Theory 168 †¢ Common Shortcuts in Judging Others 170 †¢ Specific Applications of Shortcuts in Organizations 173 The Link Between Perception and Individual Decision Making 174 Decision Making in Organizations 175 The Rational Model, Bounded Rationality, and Intuition 175 †¢ Common Biases and Errors in Decision Making 177 Influences on Decision Making: Individual Differences andRead MoreStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pagesimprove the delivered value. Subsequently, it has been recognized that Drucker’s perspective lacked strategic content in that it gives emphasis to the organizational culture, but fails to provide guidance on which customers to serve and how to serve them. Equally, Drucker’s initial views failed to take explicit account of competitors and the discipline of profit in the analysis of product and market opportunity. It is because of this that customer or ientation has been replaced with the broader concept

The Great Gatsby And Bodega Dreams The Love That Killed...

Jorel Lonesome Professor Amend 10/2/2017 ENG 307 Dangerous Dreams Indeed: The Love That Killed Bodega and Gatsby Not all American dreams end tragically, but in some cases it does. This idea could be broken down by the stories of The Great Gatsby and Bodega Dreams. Whether Jay Gatsby tries to reinvent himself or Willie Bodega tries to reinvent Spanish Harlem, The Great Gatsby and Bodega Dreams run parallel towards a common outcome. Bodega and Gatsby s ambition to live their American Dream is thwarted by love, which led them to a fate they did not understand. There are three points that I will discuss to support this claim. Bodega and Gatsby had an American dream. Their dreams were thwarted by love. Their demise was love that made them†¦show more content†¦His habit of sacrificing himself for a woman is no different than Willie Bodega’s selfishness for a similar goal. Bodega tells Vera s husband, Vidal, that she never loved him and that she was leaving him for Bodega. Vidal warns Bodega about Vera, alerting him that Vera s body is an international hotel, it has taken men from al l over the world (190). Vera ends up shooting Vidal, killing him, because she knew she could use Bodega’s money. Additionally, love made Bodega and Gatsby unable to prevent their fate. Gatsby s car hits Myrtle Wilson as it travels through the Valley of ashes (138), but it is Daisy, not Gatsby, who drives it. Daisy had struck Myrtle and sped away. Gatsby takes the blame for hitting Myrtle to protect Daisy. Gatsby reveals to Nick that he’s willing to take the blame in order to protect Daisy when he tells Nick asks him if Daisy was driving the car and Nick replies â€Å"Yes. But of course I ll say I was† (143). Gatsby thought he was being chivalrous for Daisy, but he did not care that Daisy chose not to take responsibility for her hit-and-run. Myrtle’s husband, George Wilson, gets revenge for Myrtle’s loss, assuming that Gatsby had an affair with his wife and killed her once he finds a dog leash and Myrtle s belongings. George kills Gatsby,Show MoreRe latedThe Great Gatsby and Bodega Dreams Essay623 Words   |  3 Pagesnovels, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and Bodega Dreams by Ernesto Quià ±onez portray that the greatest harm is made up of vast wealth. In the Great Gatsby, the protagonist, Jay Gatsby has made his wealth and gained his made-up sense of celebrity through bootlegging. In Bodega Dreams, the main character, Willie Bodega also sells illegal drugs. The Great Gatsby and Bodega Dreams are similar because both Gatsby and Bodega earn their money by selling illegal items, they are madly in love with somebody

Language and Politics for Public Policy- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theLanguage and Politics for Psychology and Public Policy. Answer: The essay deals with the issue of political correctness and language manipulation where one set of individual is in the position to ban words and language for the illusion of creating a coherent society. The argument is structured into three parts discussing the idea of swear words in a social context, the second paragraph deals with a how societys approach towards these words has altered and third a rationale on how manipulation of language is un-democratic and solely the privilege of one group over the other. Swear words are generally seen as taboo through which people express their strongest emotions. It is a relief button through which people channelize their anger or frustration. The demarcation between amicable and social words is no doubt social constructs which differ from one set of cultural values and social norms from the other. It is society who constructs and associates imageries and symbols with words and deems them as indecent, vulgar or regressive. According to Cavazza Guidetti, (2014) people who have acquired their language without systematic training or observation are prone to vent out their emotions with the usage of swear words. Language is a social variable and is therefore manipulated. Language manipulation is a politics on the part of state since language is considered as a symbol of power and authority shaping concepts, ideas and notions, exerting influence. If we consider politicians their language and discourse differ from private life to that of their personal. Imposing speech codes is not an answer to social problems but is merely an instrument of society to suppress the weaker section. The primary role of a language is to impart information, suppression of language only denotes the privilege over the dominant ideology over the lesser ones. There has been however a radical shift in the society towards their approach to social words and these words are grouped as hate speech consisted of prejudiced languages and vocabulary. Prominent figures opine that it is fundamental in eliminating gender or caste based discrimination and bringing forth a more positive change within the society. The language crusade has striven to change the approach of how one perceives the environment around. While criticizing the concept of swearing, one should realize the socio-cultural context, where linguistic politeness comes to represent a larger society. Therefore swearing can be viewed as a violation of the communitys right to harmony and dignity or in other words somebodys right to not hear it (Kramsch Vinall, 2015). Today swearing is seen as a deliberate act on the part of the people in order to demonstrate power and domination, where speaker is n control of the pattern of discourse. To end the discussion it can be firmly asserted that th e decision to use swear word is a matter of neurological, socio-cultural and psychological process. Swearing is sometimes seen as an act of purposeful reproach (Eccleston, 2018). Considering the facts, social constructs are indeed imposing and fascist (Philipsen Hart, 2015). With the elimination of offensive language a society can never construct the utopian world free of biasness towards caste, language rather it is ammunition used for mass suppression of feelings. A controlled environment would only accentuate the construed implications of swearing which can e used by an individual in multiple contexts. Imposing restrictions on language denotes the rise of speech community with a shared set of norms for communications, interpretation and deconstruction of speech (Kramsch Vinall, 2015). This could be used by the politicians to achieve common goal like suppressing democracy in a group, domination of the minority group and their culture and forcing others to abide by the linguistic norms in order to achieve common good. The inter-relation between language and ideology which is formed by a shared group of notions about the usage of language is highly individu alistic (Philipsen Hart, 2015). Language manipulation can lead to the birth of cultural vulnerability. Therefore it can be asserted that language domination would serve no great cause but lead to a capitalistic regime where the intellectual class in possession of materialistic values have the inherent right to introduce an atmosphere of falsity, where in the words of Friedrich, the other fellows ideas come to dominate the public discourse. Theorists have concluded that it is a form of mass domination and linguacultural ideology is the most conscious and dangerous form of domination which decides somebodys right to get offended (Govers Vermeulen, 2016). The stigmatization of language basically controls the flow of words that an individual produces from different perspectives (Newman, Hartman Taber, 2014). Therefore one can conclude stating that speech restrictions would serve very little but insinuate a reign of dissent and intervention into a person democratic rights. It should be stopped at the outset before it seeps into the subconscious part of every citizen. Reference List: Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M. (2014). Swearing in political discourse: why vulgarity works.Journal of Language and Social Psychology,33(5), 537-547. Eccleston, R. (2018). [online] Available at: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/warning-contains-coarse-language/storye6frg8h6-1111116556611?nk=a00ce3c15b2c780198bd3a12972c494d [Accessed 23 Apr. 2018]. Govers, C., Vermeulen, H. (Eds.). (2016).The politics of ethnic consciousness. Springer. Jay, T. (2009). Do offensive words harm people?.Psychology, public policy, and law,15(2), 81. Kramsch, C., Vinall, K. (2015). The cultural politics of language textbooks in the era of globalization.Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education, 11-28. Newman, B. J., Hartman, T. K., Taber, C. S. (2014). Social dominance and the cultural politics of immigration.Political Psychology,35(2), 165-186.

Moving Beyond Simple Conflict of Interest

Introduction This paper discusses some issues related to the Greber case. Greber was a physician and was the owner of Cardio-Med, Inc. The company assisted physicians by making available certain medical equipments to record the cardiac details of patients.Advertising We will write a custom case study sample on Moving Beyond Simple Conflict of Interest specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The physicians were paid a certain amount for every patient that they referred. The case deals with out of the way payments made to physicians in order to get more referrals from them. Such payments were more than the actual worth of the jobs done. The case came to light and a case was lodged. How do criminal and civil law differ? Answer: The differences between criminal law and civil law pertain to the nature of crime, the person filing the lawsuit, the punishments awarded, and substantiating evidence. With regard to the nature of crime, criminal law relates to illegal conduct, whereas civil law relates to disagreements between two parties and where the complainants haven’t broken any law. With regard to the person filing the lawsuit, â€Å"In criminal cases, the government always files the litigation or lawsuit. In civil law, the plaintiff files the lawsuit and usually is a private party such as a person or corporation† (Main, 2012). With regard to the punishment awarded, in a criminal offence the punishment awarded may range from imposing fines, imprisonment, or capital punishment (depending on the severity of the crime). In civil offences, the loser is required to compensate the monetary or other losses of the winning party. With regard to the substantiating of evidence, in criminal offences, the prosecutor (most of the time) is responsible for providing the required evidence, whereas in civil cases, mostly the plaintiff has to provide evidence. However, in both cases sometimes the other party also may have to provide evidence. In what way did this differ from joint venturing? Answer: In joint venturing the parties involved have control over the business to the extent of their share. Moreover, the agreement is a legal binding for the parties involved. But in this case, there was no binding for either Medicare or the physicians. Medicare paid to the physicians as per the referrals received. The physicians had a free will to refer patients to other medical facilities from where they could get better deals. Also, there was no legal contract between the two parties. â€Å"The execution of a letter of intent (sometimes styled as a memorandum of understanding, term sheet, protocol, summary of terms, or other titles) is the first major undertaking of negotiating a successful joint venture† (Smith Southwell, 2012). In this case, there was no such understanding. Hence this case is different from joint venturing.Advertising Looking for case study on criminal law? Let's see if we can he lp you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Do you feel that any of the physicians involved dishonored their fiduciary relationship with their patients? If so how? Answer: Yes, I do believe that the physicians dishonored their fiduciary relationship with their patients. Fiduciary relationship relates to the trust that the patients have over their physicians; trust that makes the patients believe that they will not be cheated. But in this case, in order to earn money, the physicians referred them to such clinics that charged hefty amounts (including their commission). Pamela Bucy (2010) claims that â€Å"Cardio-Med’s payment amount exceeded that which Medicare would have paid the physicians for those services† (p. 40). Medicare paid the excess amount in order to bribe the physicians to send more referrals. So indirectly the patients became a part of this payment scam where payments were made more than what was actually required. This was a financial lo ss and it was definitely a breach of trust. Summarize and give your analysis of the verdict of the case employing your own opinion. Do you agree with the verdict? Why or why not? Answer: According to the court ruling, it was ruled that Medicare made the payments to the physicians in order to induce more referrals. The court also ruled that â€Å"If one purpose of the payment was to induce future referrals, the Medicare statute has been violated† (Bucy, 2010). Stephen Pierce claims that â€Å"The Medicare and Medicaid health care programs were created in the mid-1960s in an attempt to ensure that all Americans would receive high quality health care despite their inability to pay† (Pierce, 1986). But what happened in this case was totally in contrast to what was intended. So, yes, I agree with the verdict of the court. Conclusion: As per the ruling of the court, the payments made to the physicians were done in order to attract more clients to the medical facility. Moreov er, the payments received from Medicare were diverted to the physicians; this was totally against the norms. The court ruled against Greber; Greber was found guilty. I am in favor of the judgment because it is not correct for someone to use, for profit, funds that are meant for other purposes. This case is an example of pure bribing in order to gain profits. References Bucy, P. (2010). Health care fraud: Enforcement and compliance. New York: Law Journal Press.Advertising We will write a custom case study sample on Moving Beyond Simple Conflict of Interest specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Main, K. (2012). What is the difference between criminal law and civil law? Web. Pierce, S. (1986). Comment: United States v. Greber and its effect on the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Web. Smith, B., Southwell, T. (2012). Joint Ventures: A Primer. Web. This case study on Moving Beyond Simple Conflict of Interest was written and submitted by user Giovani I. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.